Entre los dias 2 y 4 de este marzo que acaba de comenzar tuvo lugar la «2008 International Conference on Climate Change» en Nueva York. Que no habían leído nada al respecto? Evidentemente. Los medios no están interesados en una conferencia que reúne a más de 500 científicos, economistas y políticos de todo el mundo … todos ellos negacionistas! Sobre los papers presentados y el contenido de alguna de las presentaciones iré informándoles poco a poco. Me acaba de llegar todo el material de golpe y necesito unos días para leer. Sí me gustaría adelantarles el contenido de la Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change, documento que puede considerarse la declaración final de estas jornadas. También les dejo un enlace al trabajo de Fred Singer, «Nature, not human activity, rules the climate» (bájense el archivo .pdf completo, merece la pena!)
Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change
«Global warming» is not a global crisis
We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,
Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;
Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;
Recognising that the causes and extent of recently observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed «consensus» among climate experts are false;
Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing, human suffering;
Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:
Hereby declare:
That current plans to restrict anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a dangerous misallocation of intellectual capital and resources that should be dedicated to solving humanity’s real and serious problems.
That there is no convincing evidence that CO2 emissions from modern industrial activity has in the past, is now, or will in the future cause catastrophic climate change.
That attempts by governments to inflict taxes and costly regulations on industry and individual citizens with the aim of reducing emissions of CO2 will pointlessly curtail the prosperity of the West and progress of developing nations without affecting climate.
That adaptation as needed is massively more cost-effective than any attempted mitigation and that a focus on such mitigation will divert the attention and resources of governments away from addressing the real problems of their peoples.
That human-caused climate change is not a global crisis.
Now, therefore, we recommend —
That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular, but misguided works such as «An Inconvenient Truth.»
That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.
Agreed at New York, 4 March 2008
Antón Uriarte es uno de los «contributors» del librito que edita Fred S. Singer y que Luis menciona en su texto. El blog de Tierney en el NYT se atreve a poner en duda que el escepticismo sea un mero resultado de una financiación escondida por parte de malvadas corporaciones. Por supuesto la mayoría de los lectores del NYT le crucifican pero es un indicio de cambio, dada la posición oficial del NYT.
saludos
Excepcionales palabras de bienvenida del presidente del Instituto Heartland, dedicando varias líneas a los que intentan denigrar a los escépticos acusándoles de estar ‘untados’ por las petroleras, o de ser cuatro gatos, etc. Aunque lo más simpático es la invitación que realizaron a Al Gore, al que por supuesto estaban dispuestos a pagar los 200.000$ que cobra por conferencia; invitación que, claro, el citado rechazó.
Lástima de representación española….
Saludos.
Ni me había enterado!
A ver si me bajo cositas y en Semana Santa les echo un ojo…
Un saludo,