La efectividad de cualquier acción de ayuda en una zona en crisis depende de la coordinación de los medios a utilizar. En este artículo que les traigo del New York Times podemos entrever algunas de las razones por las que el trabajo en Darfur se hace complicado y lento: demasiados intereses, no siempre comunes, casi nunca bien coordinados.
Even as advocacy groups attained the seeming triumph of President Bush’s new sanctions against Sudan, the organization that helped bring the conflict in Darfur to the world’s attention is in upheaval, firing its executive director, reorganizing its board and rethinking its strategies.
At the heart of the shake-up are questions of whether the former executive director of the organization, the Save Darfur Coalition, wisely used a sudden influx of money from a few anonymous donors in an advertising blitz to push for action.
The advertisements strained relationships with aid groups working on the ground in Darfur, the western region of Sudan, where at least 200,000 people have been killed and millions have fled their homes. Many of the groups opposed some of the tone and content of Save Darfur’s high-decibel advocacy campaign.
[…]
Gracias Jordi por el chivatazo.
¡De nada! A su servicio, maese Gómez… 😉